tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5309604992043123290.post5947661144173371305..comments2024-03-24T11:22:17.354+01:00Comments on berxblog: PRKO-2007 is not always correctMartin Bergerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16504572924713610305noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5309604992043123290.post-37548252920219117882009-12-10T14:08:41.469+01:002009-12-10T14:08:41.469+01:00Der Kommentar wurde von einem Blog-Administrator entfernt.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06851281453033792625noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5309604992043123290.post-18383556050227618822009-12-08T08:45:15.551+01:002009-12-08T08:45:15.551+01:00maybe these 3 statements might make it clear:
de...maybe these 3 statements might make it clear:<br /> <br />desc v$database <br /> Name Type<br />-------------------------------<br />1 DBID NUMBER<br />2 NAME VARCHAR2(9)<br />.<br />.<br />.<br />42 DB_UNIQUE_NAME VARCHAR2(30)<br /><br /><br />show parameter db_%name <br /><br />NAME TYPE VALUE<br />-------------------<br />db_name string EDWP03<br />db_unique_name string EDWP03_SITE1<br /><br /><br />desc v$instance <br /> Name Null? Typ<br />-------------------------------<br />1 INSTANCE_NUMBER NUMBER<br />2 INSTANCE_NAME VARCHAR2(16)<br />...<br /><br />I think, there is no realy '<i>8 character</i>' limit anywhere around? <br /><br />just one more thing: we use to set <i>DB_UNIQUE_NAME</i> to a <i>_SITE1</i> string by default to be safe if we ever want to create a DataGuard config. There is only a small side effect: the default <i>SERVICE</i> is set to this name.Martin Bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16504572924713610305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5309604992043123290.post-50558146633627407072009-12-08T01:19:56.725+01:002009-12-08T01:19:56.725+01:00Just for make things a bit clear
EDWP03_SITE1
is...Just for make things a bit clear<br /><br />EDWP03_SITE1<br /><br />is not 8 character. is there a modification on it ?Coskan Gundogarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11570869033287689498noreply@blogger.com